Crooked Solicitor 21

<body topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0> <table cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr> <td valign="top" colspan=2 height=90 BGCOLOR="#006699" TEXT="#080000" background="1d0fd5a3.jpg"> <div> <FONT SIZE="5" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" ><B>Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feudal Investments, Ltd. Exposed</B></FONT><B>    </B><B> |     </B><A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feuda"><U><B>home</B></U></A></div> <div> </div> </td> </tr><tr> <td valign="top" width=210 BGCOLOR="#FFCC66" TEXT="#080000" background="1d1d2b03.jpg"> <div> <IMG SRC="157ae6c0.jpg" border=0 width="174" height="108" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0"></div> <div> <B>Justice is one of the greatest and most beautiful things next to life itself and the glorious principle of freedom.</B></div> <div> <B>This website is dedicated to bring some very despicable men to justice.</B></div> </td> <td valign="top" height=390 BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#080000"> <div> <I>Crooked Solicitor 21</I></div> <div> <A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feuda"><U>Home</U></A>  <FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >I </FONT><A HREF="id48.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="News"><U>News</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id47.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Summary of Theft"><U>Summary of Theft</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id54.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Boadas Foul and Deceitful Claim"><U>Boada's Foul and Deceitful Claim</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id55.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Core Issue"><U>Core Issue</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U>The Answer</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id19.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website1"><U>Website1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id20.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website2"><U>Website2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id21.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Revealing Article"><U>Revealing Article</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions1"><U>Deceptions1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id25.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions2"><U>Deceptions2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id40.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions3"><U>Deceptions3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada1a.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams1"><U>Scams1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id27.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams2"><U>Scams2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id29.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams3"><U>Scams3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Proof of Fraud"><U>Proof of Fraud</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id34.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice1"><U>Accomplice1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id50.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice2"><U>Accomplice2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada26.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Fake Titles"><U>Fake Titles</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id45.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries1"><U>New Discoveries1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id51.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries2"><U>New Discoveries2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="roger_anthony_pitt_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor1"><U>Crooked Solicitor1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id46.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor2"><U>Crooked Solicitor2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id62.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor3"><U>Crooked Solicitor3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id63.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor4"><U>Crooked Solicitor4</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id64.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor5"><U>Crooked Solicitor5</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id65.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor6"><U>Crooked Solicitor6</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id67.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor7"><U>Crooked Solicitor7</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id66.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor8"><U>Crooked Solicitor8</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id68.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor9"><U>Crooked Solicitor9</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id69.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor10"><U>Crooked Solicitor10</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id70.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor11"><U>Crooked Solicitor11</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id71.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor12"><U>Crooked Solicitor12</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id72.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor13"><U>Crooked Solicitor13</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id73.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor14"><U>Crooked Solicitor14</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id74.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor15"><U>Crooked Solicitor15</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id75.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor16"><U>Crooked Solicitor16</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id76.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 17"><U>Crooked Solicitor 17</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id77.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor18"><U>Crooked Solicitor18</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id78.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor19"><U>Crooked Solicitor19</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id79.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 20"><U>Crooked Solicitor 20</U></A>   |   <B>Crooked Solicitor 21</B>   |   <A HREF="id81.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 1"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id82.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 2"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id83.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 3"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id85.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Findings and Appeal"><U>Findings and Appeal</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id86.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 4"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 4</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id87.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 5"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 5</U></A>   |   <A HREF="irish_and_english_baronies.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Selling the Forbidden"><U>Selling the Forbidden</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker24.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Challenge"><U>The Challenge</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id60.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Declaration of Ownership"><U>Declaration of Ownership</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id57.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Diversion Tactics"><U>Diversion Tactics</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id42.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Reactions"><U>Reactions</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id33.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Disclaimer"><U>Disclaimer</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id23.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Contact "><U>Contact </U></A>   |   <A HREF="id44.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Index"><U>Index</U></A></div> <bR> <div> <B>If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "</B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them.</B></div> <div> <B> </B></div> <div> <B>*************************************</B></div> <div> <B>Article about Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal 2</B></div> <bR> <div> November 26, 2008</div> <bR> <div> Dear Mr. Pitts-Tucker, </div> <bR> <div> Again from the <B>November 19, 2008</B> article I found in the <I><B>TimesOnline</B></I> entitled, “<B>Solicitor accused of aiding 'bogus' trade in feudal titles,</B>” it states, “<B>His counsel, Gregory Treverton-Jones, QC, will argue . . . that he [Mr. Pitts-Tucker] was only instructed after buyers had entered into the sale agreement.</B>” (<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article5187689.ece</U></B></FONT>)</div> <bR> <div> You declared in one of your letters to the Law Society that the sales are a "<B>done deal</B>" before you enter the picture. You stated that it was an "<B>agreement already made.</B>" In other words, you say the sale, the contract, etc. is already made before you are involved. But the problem with this is that, "<B>Conveyancing Does Not Start Until There Has Been A Sale</B>," not before.<B> </B>(<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>www.relv.com.au/conveyancing/conveyancing.asp</U></B></FONT>)<B> </B>The point here is:</div> <bR> <div> <B>Given that conveyancing is the process of transferring ownership of real estate from one person to another, there is no need for conveyancing services until such time as a sale has taken place. It is only after the sale has been effected that the purchaser acquires the right to require a transfer of ownership.</B> (Ibid.)</div> <bR> <div> The "<B>done deal</B>" excuse doesn’t in any way prove or even imply that you are not the <B>conveyancing solicitor.</B> Rather it implies that you are grasping at straws. As this is one is really flimsy. It is a rationalization and it proves nothing.</div> <bR> <div> In the article I found in the <I><B>TimesOnline</B></I> entitled, “<B>Solicitor accused of aiding 'bogus' trade in feudal titles,</B>” it states “<B>He [Mr. Pitts-Tucker] maintains that his role was not akin to doing the conveyance for a property transaction. . . .</B>” (<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article5187689.ece</U></B></FONT>)</div> <bR> <div> Now it doesn’t take a really smart person to figure out that you really were the <B>conveyancing solicitor.</B> </div> <div> Legally, you "<B>knew or ought to have known</B>" and are therefore responsible for the fact that Mr. Boada’s website stated that you, personally, did "<B>all</B>" the "<B>conveyances</B>" via the "<B>law of real property.</B>" May I also remind you that in your <B>September 29, 2003</B> letter to the Law Society, you admitted to having observed what was declared about you on your client’s website and had Mr. Boada correct errors he had about you, but, and this is important, you did not have him change the fact that you were the one who did “<B>all</B>” the “<B>conveyances.</B>”</div> <bR> <div> If you were not the conveyancing solicitor or supervising conveyancer---the one responsible, how come in Mr. Boada’s <B>March 5, 2003</B> letter to you, which you shared with the Law Society, that is, how come it states, "<B>. . . The solicitor need only deduce title going back fifteen (15) years,</B>" and "<B>Roger Pitts-Tucker, conforming to the norms of English law, deduces title strictly back to the fifteen years required by English law.</B>"</div> <bR> <div> If you weren’t the conveyancer, how come in Mr. Boada’s official statement to the State of Florida mediation program, did she, Margaret Montalvo, Esq. state on <B>December 16, 2002</B> that "<B>Pitts-Tucker & Co., which is a firm of solicitors, handled all [not some, but all] legal transactions from start to finish?</B>" (The Law Society has a copy of this letter) She further stated, "<B>The solicitors [your firm] validate the titles in England.</B>" This validation or "<B>deducing of title</B>" is one of the major duties of a <B>conveyancing solicitor</B>. </div> <bR> <div> If you weren’t the conveyancing solicitor, how come Mr. Boada’s website also declared that "<B>All such conveyances [the conveying of ‘feudal titles of nobility . . . under the law of property. . . .’] are done by our specialised, fully licensed attorneys. . . ?</B>" (Mr. Boada’s website under "<B>Purchase Documents and Guarantees</B>") Under "<B>Our Firm</B>" on his website, Mr. Boada identified the principal solicitor, who does "<B>all</B>" the "<B>conveyances,</B>" as "<B>Mr. R. A, Pitts-Tucker.</B>"</div> <bR> <div> If you weren’t the one responsible for the conveyances, how come Mr. Boada made it clear that you were, in fact, the conveyancer? </div> <bR> <div> How lame can you get? Any thinking person knows you are the one responsible. And everything Mr. Boada stated on his website confirms not only that you were the conveyancer, but that everything was done according to the <B>law of real property</B>. So you’re denial that these titles were “<B>a property transaction</B>” is looney as they come. Sometimes I think you have lost your marbles. I don’t understand how you could put up such lame excuses or deny that it is raining and that you are walking on thin ice.</div> <bR> <div> For example, Mr. Boada made it clear on his website in the “<B>Frequently Asked Questions</B>” page:</div> <bR> <div> <B>Are these titles genuine? Yes, feudal titles are considered `incorporeal hereditaments' or intangible property under the Law of Property Act 1922-1925 of the United Kingdom. We do not sell disguised legal name changes, nor a square foot of land in the form of a ‘souvenir plot’ in order to put you name on a deed with a title included in it nor do we sell copyrights, patents, trademark, etc. We sell the actual property [incorporeal hereditaments] required by the law to grant the rank and status of nobility.</B> </div> <bR> <div> Earlier on the webpage entitled, “<B>Purchase Documents and Guarentees</B>,” Mr. Boada declared:</div> <bR> <div> <B>Feudal titles of nobility are in law considered `incorporeal hereditaments' or intangible property and as such come under the law of property in most countries like the United Kingdom, Ireland and others. . . .</B></div> <bR> <div> But more importantly, your firm itself confirmed the above. On <B>December 11, 2000 </B>in your letter to Dr. [name redacted], you firm declared that Mr. Boada's feudal titles are not “<B>copyrights</B>,” “<B>trademarks</B>,” or “<B>Deed Poll</B>” name changes, but real, authentic, genuine titles. And the, “<B>The law of real property applies to incorporeal hereditaments in that they can only be conveyed by deed.</B> Plus, “<B>The company [BFI] sells the actual title itself [not just a “name”] and the sale is made by way of a Deed of Transfer or Conveyance, which is the legal method of effecting such a sale.</B>” </div> <bR> <div> In addition, your company made it clear that a feudal title was not just a “<B>name,</B>” but something connected to land as any other “<B>incorporeal hereditament.</B>” Pitts-Tucker & Co. wrote:</div> <bR> <div> <B>A feudal title may have very real and valuable appurtenant rights, such as mineral rights, or the right to levy a charge for access to common land, or rights of franchise to hold a market or fair, or very rarely, a right displacing a Crown prerogative right to wreck. None of these rights of course apply when buying merely a 'name', copyright or trademark. Reference may be made to the Law of Property Acts 1922 - 1925.</B></div> <bR> <div> A simple reading of my<B> Deed of Transfer </B>or most, if not all, of the<B> Deeds of Transfer </B>and <B>Statutory Declarations </B>of your client would be proof solid enough to demonstrate that real property law was being used to effect the conveyances. In addition, Mr. Boada said in a letter to a [name redacted], who inquired about a German feudal title, dated <B>September 18, 2002</B>, that if he bought this German feudal title, he would be given a <B>Deed of Transfer</B> and a <B>Statutory Declaration</B> confirming his purchase and “<B>All of these documents would be in full legal conformity with the British Law of Property Act 1922-1925 and the Conveyancing Act of 1881.</B>”<B> </B></div> <bR> <div> Again, stop the nonsense. You don’t have a leg to stand on. You haven’t fulfilled the “<B>undertaking</B>” you gave me, you haven’t provided a good “<B>root of title,</B>” you didn’t disclose a latent fatal defect of title---the reality of a bad title, you negligently disregarded evidence of fraud. How bad can it get? Worse! You confessed that you knew from the onset that Mr. Boada was misrepresenting his wares. You really are a crooked solicitor allowing such deceit and under-handed, fraudulent transaction to take place right under you nose while you foolishly looked the other way to the tune of “<B>255 titles.</B>” My Goodness, what a lot of cheating and defrauding of innocent, unsuspecting people you are responsible for.</div> <bR> <div> My feeling is that unless you can prove that my transaction was real---was genuinely from the real owners---the heirs to the patrimony of the Imperial and Royal House of Hohenzollern, then you are the unmitigated villain who deserves the worst that can come to a man who perpetuates fraud and deception and robs and cheats people. No such persons should have honor before men as respectable when their behavior has been disrespectable.</div> <bR> <div> A confession might be a major step in the right direction for you and everyone involved. You could help bring your despicable client to justice and may thereby make a great contribution to society and people all over the world.</div> <bR> <div> Think it over.</div> <bR> <div> Sincerely yours, </div> <bR> <div> <B>If you have been victimized by Mr. Boada, Mr. Williams or Mr. Pitts-Tucker, it’s time to make criminal complaints and sue them for the detestable things they have done to you and many others. It’s like the saying, “United we stand divided we fall.” Only when the authorities see that hundreds have actually been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this serious case. Go to “</B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>” for more information.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Please read the "</B><FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#BF0000" FACE="Benguiat Bk BT" ><A HREF="id33.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Disclaimer"><U><B>Disclaimer.</B></U></A></FONT><B>"</B></div> <bR> <div> <A HREF="id79.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 20"><U><B>Previous Page</B></U></A><B> /</B><A HREF="irish_and_english_baronies.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Selling the Forbidden"><U><B> </B></U></A><A HREF="id81.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 1"><U><B>Next Page</B></U></A><FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Times New Roman" ><A HREF="id81.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 1"><U> </U></A></FONT></div> <bR> <bR> <bR> <bR> <bR> <bR> <bR> </td> </tr></table></body>