Open Defiance of Undertaking 1

<body topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0> <table cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr> <td valign="top" colspan=2 height=90 BGCOLOR="#006699" TEXT="#080000" background="1d0fd5a3.jpg"> <div> <FONT SIZE="5" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" ><B>Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feudal Investments, Ltd. Exposed</B></FONT><B>     </B><B>|</B><B>     </B><A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feuda"><U><B>home</B></U></A></div> <bR> <div> </div> </td> </tr><tr> <td valign="top" width=210 BGCOLOR="#FFCC66" TEXT="#080000" background="1d1d2b03.jpg"> <div> <IMG SRC="157ae6c0.jpg" border=0 width="174" height="108" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0"></div> <div> <B>Justice is one of the greatest and most beautiful things next to life itself and the glorious principle of freedom.</B></div> <div> <B>This website is dedicated to bring some very despicable men to justice.</B></div> </td> <td valign="top" height=390 BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#080000"> <div> <I>Open Defiance of Undertaking 1</I></div> <div> <A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feuda"><U>Home</U></A>  <FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >I </FONT><A HREF="id48.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="News"><U>News</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id47.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Summary of Theft"><U>Summary of Theft</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id54.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Boadas Foul and Deceitful Claim"><U>Boada's Foul and Deceitful Claim</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id55.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Core Issue"><U>Core Issue</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U>The Answer</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id19.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website1"><U>Website1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id20.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website2"><U>Website2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id21.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Revealing Article"><U>Revealing Article</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions1"><U>Deceptions1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id25.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions2"><U>Deceptions2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id40.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions3"><U>Deceptions3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada1a.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams1"><U>Scams1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id27.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams2"><U>Scams2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id29.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams3"><U>Scams3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Proof of Fraud"><U>Proof of Fraud</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id34.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice1"><U>Accomplice1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id50.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice2"><U>Accomplice2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada26.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Fake Titles"><U>Fake Titles</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id45.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries1"><U>New Discoveries1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id51.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries2"><U>New Discoveries2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="roger_anthony_pitt_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor1"><U>Crooked Solicitor1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id46.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor2"><U>Crooked Solicitor2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id62.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor3"><U>Crooked Solicitor3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id63.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor4"><U>Crooked Solicitor4</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id64.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor5"><U>Crooked Solicitor5</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id65.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor6"><U>Crooked Solicitor6</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id67.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor7"><U>Crooked Solicitor7</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id66.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor8"><U>Crooked Solicitor8</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id68.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor9"><U>Crooked Solicitor9</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id69.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor10"><U>Crooked Solicitor10</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id70.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor11"><U>Crooked Solicitor11</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id71.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor12"><U>Crooked Solicitor12</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id72.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor13"><U>Crooked Solicitor13</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id73.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor14"><U>Crooked Solicitor14</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id74.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor15"><U>Crooked Solicitor15</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id75.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor16"><U>Crooked Solicitor16</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id76.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 17"><U>Crooked Solicitor 17</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id77.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor18"><U>Crooked Solicitor18</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id78.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor19"><U>Crooked Solicitor19</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id79.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 20"><U>Crooked Solicitor 20</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id80.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 21"><U>Crooked Solicitor 21</U></A>   |   <B>Open Defiance of Undertaking 1</B>   |   <A HREF="id82.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 2"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id83.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 3"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id85.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Findings and Appeal"><U>Findings and Appeal</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id86.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 4"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 4</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id87.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 5"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 5</U></A>   |   <A HREF="irish_and_english_baronies.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Selling the Forbidden"><U>Selling the Forbidden</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker24.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Challenge"><U>The Challenge</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id60.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Declaration of Ownership"><U>Declaration of Ownership</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id57.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Diversion Tactics"><U>Diversion Tactics</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id42.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Reactions"><U>Reactions</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id33.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Disclaimer"><U>Disclaimer</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id23.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Contact "><U>Contact </U></A>   |   <A HREF="id44.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Index"><U>Index</U></A></div> <bR> <div> <B>If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "</B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them.</B></div> <div> <B> </B></div> <div> <B>*************************************</B></div> <div> <B>Invitation and Challenge</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>If Mr. Pitts-Tucker follows this challenge he might be able to stop all further misconduct and any criminal charges, but of course he can't, but he will probably get one more chance as stated.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>*************************************</B></div> <bR> <div> April 11, 2009</div> <bR> <div> Dear Mr. Pitts-Tucker,</div> <bR> <div> This letter is my annual invitation for you to fulfill your firm's “<B>undertaking</B>” as given to me on September 20, 2000, and wrong me no more. </div> <bR> <div> You have rightfully been convicted in a court of law (the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal) of professional misconduct. Your dishonesty, guilt and unprofessionalism has been amply substantiated despite expert and skilled defense. But I was informed that the whole major purpose of my original compliant was unaddressed and unfortunately bypassed.  I was kept in the dark about this all these years as the Law Society would not tell me anything. Therefore, I have made a second formal complaint with my usual detail and in depth documentation against you, because a solicitor's<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#444444" FACE="Arial" > “</FONT><B>undertaking</B>” “<B>is a personal legal guarantee by the solicitor that something will be done. . . .</B>” (<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><A HREF="http://www.inzo.com/selling/jargon.php" TARGET="_top" TITLE="http://www.inzo.com/selling/jargon.php"><U><B><U>www.inzo.com/selling/jargon.php</U></B></U></A></FONT>) The September 2000 “<B>undertaking</B>” was never fulfilled, which I told you would be financially disastrous for me and cripple me. Your failure to do your duty was the direct cause of my bankruptcy in 2002 from which I have never fully recovered. I still suffer from it. In fact, I am still dependent and relying on you to fulfill your “<B>personal legal guarantee</B>” your firm's promise, so I can get out of the financial hole you put me in by your willful violation. </div> <bR> <div> There are two major reasons you should do this are: </div> <bR> <div> (1) It is just, fair and right. To do otherwise, is to leave me empty handed. All I have is bad title to the property I bought, because to fulfill your “<B>undertaking</B>” would have given me “<B>good title.</B>” Since, “<B>a bad title is one which conveys no property to a purchaser of an estate,</B>” this means I was cheated and an act of injustice was committed. (<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><A HREF="http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/t030.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/t030.htm"><U><B><U>www.lectlaw.com/def2/t030.htm</U></B></U></A></FONT>) There is nothing fair or equitable about this. I was robbed of my right to the property I paid for, and</div> <bR> <div> (2) You are professionally bound and obligated to fulfill your firm's promise. The only honorable thing to do is fulfill this requirement. This is the minimum standard and expectation of your profession. In fact, this is so important that it is considered an act of professional misconduct not to honor this kind of binding promise. The Guide says in no uncertain terms that, “<B>A solicitor who fails to honour an undertaking is prima facie guilty of professional misconduct.</B>” (<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><A HREF="http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/" TARGET="_top" TITLE="http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/"><U><B><U>www.lawsociety.org.uk</U></B></U></A></FONT></div> <div> <B><U>/professional/conduct/guideonline/view=page.law?POLICYID=426&PARENT=424</U></B><FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >) </FONT></div> <bR> <div> The unequivocal “<B>undertaking</B>” your firm gave me is straightforward. You are to provide the “<B>documents</B>” I had been requesting that would prove that the Imperial and Royal House of Hohenzollern (The Prinz/Prinzessin von Preussen's), who were the sellers (through the Hohenzollern Family Land Trust, according to the Deed of Transfer and all three Statutory Declarations) actually sold or conveyed their property (the incorporeal hereditament or feudal principality of Halberstadt) to me through Antonio A. Boada as stated in those legal documents. </div> <bR> <div> I stated in my first official complaint what would satisfy that complaint. </div> <div> This never took place. I wrote back in September/October 2002: </div> <bR> <div> <B>What would satisfy the complaint:</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>What would satisfy this particular grievance is if Roger Pitts-Tucker would provide irrefutable proof that could be verified and confirmed that the transfer of the title was actually/truly conveyed by senior members of the Imperial and Royal House of country-regionPrussia through placeCityAntony Boada to me as claimed. </B></div> <bR> <div> This is what would fulfill the “<B>undertaking.</B>” Note that the evidence would be verifiable and confirmable and that it would have to be irrefutable. That is, the Imperial family would have to publicly confirm that this sale was valid and legitimate and actually took place otherwise, the “<B>undertaking</B>” would be in breach and I would still be without ownership of the property I purchased. Remember it is “<B>. . . the general rule that a purchaser is entitled to require a good title. . . ,</B>” even a<B> </B>“<B>. . . </B><I><B>primâ facie</B></I><B> a right to a good title. . . .</B>” (Court of Appeals, Ellis v. Rogers, April 25,26, May 3, 1884, Cotton, Bowen, and Rry, LJJ) </div> <bR> <div> According to Paul Kreling, an English barrister, the whole purpose of the <B>Solicitors Act 1974</B> when referring to <B>conveyancing</B> was to protect the buyer. He wrote, “<B>The present conveyancing system purports [that is, has the seminal intention] to have two main aims [or purposes]: the first is to protect the purchaser against `quasi legal defects'; the second is to establish the title of the vendor.</B>” (<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><A HREF="http://www.libertarian.co.uk/" TARGET="_top" TITLE="http://www.libertarian.co.uk/"><U><B><U>www.libertarian.co.uk</U></B></U></A><B><U> /lapubs/legan/legan011.pdf</U></B></FONT>) What kind of solicitor would support, defend or encourage a system which ensured that none of these protections would exist in his client's company? That is where your dishonesty rears its ugly head. Your foul and despicable behavior robbed me, and left me without any protection. Again: </div> <bR> <div> <B>The [whole] system of conveyancing is designed to ensure that the buyer gets the land [or intangible real property in this case] together with all the rights that go with it, and knows about any restrictions in advance.</B> (<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><A HREF="http://encycl.opentopia.com/" TARGET="_top" TITLE="http://encycl.opentopia.com/"><U><B><U>http://encycl.opentopia.com</U></B></U></A><B><U>/term/Conveyancing</U></B></FONT>) </div> <bR> <div> I was denied this, and I have also been denied the fulfillment of your firm's “<B>undertaking,</B>” which would have “<B>ensure[d] that the buyer [myself got] . . . the land [or intangible real property in this case] together with all the rights that go with it. . . .</B>” </div> <bR> <div> You owe me this obligation and it is unacceptable, substandard practice that I have had to wait nine years for it. Your actions toward me reflect an reprobate, unprofessionalism that proves that you are unsuitable and unworthy to be a solicitor of England and Wales. </div> <bR> <div> I have asked the Solicitors Regulation Authority to give you one last chance of proving that you are above board, honest and honorable by fulfilling your “<B>undertaking</B>” in a professional manner before initiating any proceedings against you in the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. I have also asked them to forgo making formal criminal complaints against you and Mr. Boada to the City of placeCityLondon Fraud Squad until you have had a chance to clear your name and your honor. The ball is in your court. Make good on this opportunity. </div> <bR> <div> I was told we must wait for the SDT findings and orders to be published before things can start in earnest, but I know, and you know, that you have wronged me terribly. I ask you to redeem yourself and show yourself deserving of the high status of a man of honor, justice and truth. </div> <bR> <div> Fiona Woolf, a former president of the Law Society said, “<B>The good name of solicitors is being jeopardised by a minority who betray the high principles of which our profession is proud.</B>” (<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>http://lawsociety.org.uk/documents/downloads/Profethics_SettingUp.pdf</U></B></FONT>) Stop being one of those who betray the high trust and do your duty toward me and your profession. </div> <bR> <div> Remember, that a solicitor “. . . <B>owes allegiance to a higher cause. It is the cause of truth and justice.</B>” (Lord Denning, Rondel v Worsley) And solicitors are to be of “<B>. . .</B> <B>unquestionable integrity, probity and trustworthiness.</B>” (<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>www.cpso.on.ca/Info_Public/Dis_sum/WEBDISC/2002/MooreM.pdf</U></B></FONT>) You advertized for years that you offered “<B>the highest standards of excellence and integrity</B>” on your website. </div> <bR> <div> Prove that you are this kind of person. Prove yourself honest and honorable. Prove that the transaction that took place in the year 2000 gave to me something genuine and authentic rather than something that was merely an act deceitful theft --- fulfill your word and provide the necessary “<B>documents</B>” rather than be in breach or violation of your duty. </div> <bR> <div> Would this be in your best interests? Of course! Would it be better if you have already done it willingly rather than to be forced to do it later? Of course! Might this actually prevent an investigation by the City of CityplaceLondon against you and Mr. Boada for fraud. Of course! That is, it might actually make the case unprofitable for them to prosecute. It's your call. But I expect and need for you to do your duty and fulfill your “<B>undertaking.</B>” I am relying on you so I can practice the profession I was educated for, which would enable me to prosper and get out of the crippling effects of what you did to me.</div> <bR> <div> Sincerely yours,</div> <bR> <div> <B>Only if everyone makes complaints will something happen. It’s like the saying, “United we stand divided we fall.” Only when the authorities see that hundreds have been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this case. Go to “</B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>” for more information.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Please read the "</B><FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#BF0000" FACE="Benguiat Bk BT" ><A HREF="id33.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Disclaimer"><U><B>Disclaimer.</B></U></A></FONT><B>"</B></div> <bR> <div> <A HREF="id80.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 21"><U><B>Previous Page</B></U></A><A HREF="id80.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 21"><U><B> </B></U></A><B>/ </B><A HREF="id82.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 2"><U><B>Next Page</B></U></A>    </div> <bR> <bR> <bR> </td> </tr></table></body>