|
Open Defiance of Undertaking 4
If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "The Answer" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them.
*************************************
September 25, 2009
Dear Mr. Pitts-Tucker,
Since you are appealing the Tribunal Findings, Id like you to correct one of your submissions that gives the wrong impression and is a personal affront to me.
In the November 2008 Tribunal Findings (#224), under "The Submissions of the Respondent," it states, "Mr G failed to disclose the Halberstadt title in his bankruptcy." (www.sra.org.uk/documents
/consumers/SDT/2009/Aug/pitts-tucker-9722.07.pdf) The innuendo or insinuation is that what I did was dishonest and wrong.
Let me set the record straight:
I was never accused of any wrong doing whatsoever. I was not censured or fined nor was the subject ever brought up. Why, because they all knew I had done nothing wrong. I had "bad title" to the property, which no one even questioned. "Bad title" as you know means by definition: "A title to property that offers questionable [or no right of] ownership and cannot [properly] be transferred to another party" (www.yourdictionary
.com/business/bad-title) So no wonder the world considers HIRH Prince Georg Friedrich von Preussen as being the Prince of Halberstadt rather than myself, because I have no way of proving my claim. (www.theroyalforums.com/forums/f214/titles-legal-status-precedence-and-other-related-matters-of-the-hohenzollerns-17019-2.html) (http://derreaktionaer.blogspot.com/2007/06/kaisergeburtstag.html)
The Imperial General Secretary and House attorney denied that the Imperial and Royal House sold the feudal property. A few years later, the woman who replaced him after he retired as general secretary also confirmed the same, and the new House attorney also denied that the Imperial House sold the property. (www.phoneynobletitles.com/id54.htm)
Bad title . . . conveys no property to a purchaser of an estate. (www.lectlaw.com/def2/t030.htm) This is why I asked over and over again consistently all these years that you prove that I had good title, because I was ripped off. Your firms undertaking promised me the proof I needed to actually prove that I owned the property I purchased.
With this concept in mind, the Federal Judge declared in court that, even though the evidence was not before the court, that she considered that the whole thing was probably a scam. The only reason the title had any worth to the court was because Mr. Boada gave them $23,000.00 for it. This gave the title value, which could be used in the bankruptcy proceedings for the benefit of debts.
The point is, I never did anything wrong and no one, but you and Mr. Boada alleged otherwise. I was never accused by the court. The subject never came up nor was it ever brought up. It was never even discussed. No charges or allegations were made. No one felt I was guilty. If anything they thought I was a victim of a con artist.
In other words, it is totally wrong and out of place for you to imply or insinuate any wrong doing on my part for there was none.
If there is a new hearing on the Tribunal findings, I will have a certified letter sent from the Office of the Clerk of the Utah Federal Bankruptcy Court to show my complete innocence and honesty in this unfortunate and devastating situation.
Again, I request that you do your duty. Your firm obligated itself in a binding promise to send me that documents that would prove in a confirmable way that the Imperial House of Hohenzollern were party to this transaction and actually sold the Imperial incorporeal hereditament or feudal rights to the Principality of Halberstadt to me through Antonio A. Boada.
From the first official complaint in 2002, I wrote what would fulfill your firms promise and obligation to me. It still stands firm and immovable, because you are still, after all these years, in violation of professional standards --- your conduct represents serious willful misconduct. The following is what must be done to rectify this situation:
What would satisfy this particular grievance is if Roger Pitts-Tucker would provide irrefutable proof that could be verified and confirmed that the transfer of the title was actually/truly conveyed by senior members [that is, the rightful heirs] of the Imperial and Royal House of Prussia through Antony Boada to me as claimed [in the transfer or conveyance documents]. (First official complaint to the Law Society in 2002)
If you would be honorable and worthy of your status as a solicitor, you must no longer be in breach of your undertaking.
Sincerely yours,
Only if everyone makes complaints will something happen. Its like the saying, United we stand divided we fall. Only when the authorities see that hundreds have been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this case. Go to The Answer for more information.
|